PUBLIC LEARNING // BUILD 0.18.59
Companion intelligence dossier
Read the record.
Separate the claim.
Protect the person.
Dossier Academy is the public educational layer of RogueIntelligence.org. It explains how intelligence work is organized across different countries and political systems, how evidence becomes a judgment, how cover and loyalty differ, and how distress can be understood without turning nationality, religion, diagnosis, or lived experience into a credibility score.
Internationally fair intelligence education
One method across countries—without pretending every country is the same.
The Global Intelligence Atlas applies the same institutional questions, evidence vocabulary, oversight review, uncertainty labels, and dignity rules to each jurisdiction. It does not rank countries, assign permanent heroes or enemies, or use nationality, ethnicity, religion, migration status, diagnosis, disability, or political disagreement as a threat score.
Formal and practical authority
Published law, official structure, practical influence, independent reporting, disputed claims, and unknowns remain separate.
Function before mythology
Foreign intelligence, police, military, diplomacy, financial intelligence, protective security, cyber defense, religious administration, and propaganda are not casually collapsed together.
No false balance
Disputed allegations and independently corroborated findings both remain visible, but they do not receive the same confidence label.
Declassification asymmetry
More public documents may reflect greater transparency rather than greater activity; opacity is recorded instead of filled with speculation.
Two sites, one learning system
Game in one place. Dossier in another.
RogueIntelligence.org
The authoritative VR-first educational MMO. It owns sessions, facts, evidence, access, inventory, mission outcomes, cover state, safety decisions, and provider validation.
PsychologicalWar.org
The separate companion dossier: character atlas, case archive, field manual, evidence lab, and public research guide. It should remain valuable even when no game session is active.
Shared principle
A person is never reducible to a diagnosis, job title, faction, cover, one frightened statement, one institutional record, or one model-generated response.
What intelligence work actually is
An evidence production cycle—not a superpower.
Collection, analysis, and decision are different functions. More data can increase confusion when provenance, independence, and requirements are weak.
Direction
Define what must be understood, why it matters, and what legal or ethical limits apply.
Collection
Gather authorized human, signals, imagery, financial, measurement, cyber, and open-source material.
Processing
Authenticate, translate, normalize, index, and protect raw material without losing its origin.
Analysis
Compare hypotheses, explain contradictions, identify gaps, and calibrate confidence.
Dissemination
Deliver the judgment with the right urgency, detail, classification, and uncertainty.
Feedback
Correct errors, refine requirements, record what changed, and revisit assumptions.
Collection and analysis disciplines
Different sensors. Different blind spots.
Cover and legend literacy
A public identity is an access explanation.
The game teaches consistency, competence, scrutiny, and consequences. It does not teach document fabrication or evasion.
| Cover family | What it explains | What independent scrutiny tests |
|---|---|---|
| Official / diplomatic | Government presence, official travel, state meetings. | Known status, monitoring, and whether activity fits the official role. |
| Commercial | Travel, payments, clients, trade events, executive networking. | Employment, expertise, clients, revenue, taxes, and lifestyle consistency. |
| Academic | Research questions, conferences, specialists, long-term study. | Publications, supervisors, institutional ties, expertise, and chronology. |
| Technical contractor | Equipment, projects, systems, and facilities access. | Real competence, contract history, peers, and professional behavior. |
Persona doctrine
Five questions that must not collapse.
Appearance
Who does the person appear to be?
Public role is not actual function.Access
What can the person legitimately reach?
Capability is not intent.Function
What are they doing in this operation?
Current function may be temporary.Loyalty
Whom or what are they protecting?
Loyalty may be divided or unknown.State
What condition are they in right now?
Temporary state is not personality or diagnosis.Review all 29 persona dimensions and 18 temporary states
Persona dimensions
Temporary states
Interactive differential-evidence exercise
Operation Shadow Chorus
A real credential anomaly, a lighting fault, an uncertain message, a pressured witness, and an institution protecting itself. Select records, then ask what the evidence supports—and what it cannot support.
RECORD SELECTION
Loading authored case…
EXPLAINABLE RESULT
No assessment yet
Start with the record type.Observation, report, experienced meaning, and hypothesis have different evidentiary roles.
Result details
The assessment will appear here in plain language.
Directional relationship analysis
Trust is not reciprocal by default.
Adjust the six dimensions in each direction. The lab identifies asymmetry without claiming hidden motives.
Tala → Supervisor
Supervisor → Tala
Relationship comparison
No relationship audit yet.
Human experience, not plot shorthand
How distress may feel, appear, and be supported.
These descriptions are educational, variable, and non-diagnostic. A person may have some, all, or none of these experiences. Direct safety needs always matter more than a label.
Psychosis
Perception, belief, thought, and shared reality may become difficult to organize. The experience can be frightening and internally coherent.
Do not assume violence, guilt, or global unreliability.Trauma and PTSD
Intrusions, avoidance, numbing, startle, sleep disruption, guilt, and threat scanning may persist after danger.
Offer control, predictability, pacing, and recovery.Moral injury
Guilt, shame, anger, betrayal, or loss of meaning may follow actions or failures that violate deeply held values.
Separate accountability from humiliation.Sleep and cognitive strain
Attention, memory, judgment, emotion regulation, and perception can deteriorate when sleep is severely restricted.
Pause consequential decisions and verify independently.Support-response exercise
Choose how the player responds to a distressed witness. Coercion and forced affirmation never unlock an objective.
Support assessment
No support assessment yet.
Myth / evidence / game consequence
Challenge the cinematic shortcut.
Myth: access proves guilt.
Evidence: access proves opportunity. Intent, timing, action, and corroboration are separate.
Game: access opens an inquiry; it cannot burn a cover by itself.
Myth: diagnosis determines truth.
Evidence: health context may affect communication but does not decide whether an external event happened.
Game: every claim receives ordinary provenance review.
Myth: pressure produces truth.
Evidence: coercion can produce compliance, confusion, false statements, and contaminated evidence.
Game: threats stop the scene and block rewards.
Research traceability
The lesson points back to the evidence.
The flat package retains 160 complete reports across nine source packages, including 17 owner-supplied international comparative reports, a five-report balanced profile batch, twelve regional and methodological reports, and one commissioning-prompt provenance record. Project `.uai` memory contains a checksum and deep link for every report; this page exposes only public-safe summaries.
PsychologicalWar.org should provide a public, cited reading edition. RogueIntelligence.org retains package-local development evidence and uses it to generate mechanics, tests, and debriefs.